The High Court has upheld an order regulating the engagement of temporary drivers in the state-run transport service, reinforcing existing legal limits on employment practices. The ruling clarifies that only drivers appointed through approved procedures can be engaged for regular operations, bringing renewed focus to recruitment policies within the public transport sector.
The case was filed following concerns raised about the increasing reliance on empanelled or temporary drivers to fill staff shortages. Petitioners argued that such practices undermined job security, violated service rules, and compromised passenger safety due to inconsistent training standards.
In its judgment, the court observed that while staff shortages are a genuine challenge, they cannot be addressed by bypassing established recruitment norms. The ruling emphasized that public transport services carry a high responsibility toward passenger safety and must adhere strictly to legal and procedural frameworks.
Transport department officials acknowledged that the judgment would have operational implications, particularly during peak travel seasons. However, they noted that steps are being taken to accelerate permanent recruitment processes and improve workforce planning.
Trade unions welcomed the decision, calling it a victory for workers’ rights and transparency. They argued that long-term reliance on temporary staff leads to exploitation and weakens institutional accountability. At the same time, unions urged the government to address manpower shortages urgently to avoid service disruptions.
Commuters expressed mixed reactions. While many supported the move for improved safety and accountability, others worried about potential reductions in bus services in the short term.
Experts suggest that the ruling could act as a catalyst for broader reforms in public transport management. By prioritizing structured recruitment and training, authorities may be able to improve service quality while ensuring legal compliance.
News as reported
